<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 things Ruby on Rails has that Java doesn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java</link>
	<description>Anecdotes on Technology Leadership, Ruby, Java, Scala, Cloud Computing, Open-Source, SEO, and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:43:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish</title>
		<link>http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java/comment-page-1#comment-40148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java#comment-40148</guid>
		<description>A couple of points that I thought should be highlighted:
1. Thanks to Ruby, Rails follows what it calls &quot;Don&#039;t Repeat Yourself&quot;. It avoids any kind of redundancy or code repetition only possible due to the dynamic nature of Ruby. This is something very difficult to achieve in strongly typed languages like java.

2. Rails encourages conventions over configuration. While a J2EE developer spends a lot of time in XML configurations and tying up the components, Rails does this implicitly with minimal or no manual intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points that I thought should be highlighted:<br />
1. Thanks to Ruby, Rails follows what it calls &#8220;Don&#8217;t Repeat Yourself&#8221;. It avoids any kind of redundancy or code repetition only possible due to the dynamic nature of Ruby. This is something very difficult to achieve in strongly typed languages like java.</p>
<p>2. Rails encourages conventions over configuration. While a J2EE developer spends a lot of time in XML configurations and tying up the components, Rails does this implicitly with minimal or no manual intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real ringtones</title>
		<link>http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java/comment-page-1#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>Real ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 05:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Real ringtones...&lt;/strong&gt;

Download Cool Ringtone Right This Time: Real ringtones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Real ringtones&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Download Cool Ringtone Right This Time: Real ringtones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choonkeat</title>
		<link>http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java/comment-page-1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>choonkeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabrito.com/post/the-appeal-of-ruby-over-java#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Just to highlight.. 

Point #2: Yes! Can&#039;t agree more! And that could well be the biggest productivity gainer. 

Point #5: I think this is not talked about as much, but I agree, the conventions goes a long way - producing more consistent web apps, amongst different developers... and believe it or not, might very well be more consistent than how some companies are producing their various own web projects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to highlight.. </p>
<p>Point #2: Yes! Can&#8217;t agree more! And that could well be the biggest productivity gainer. </p>
<p>Point #5: I think this is not talked about as much, but I agree, the conventions goes a long way &#8211; producing more consistent web apps, amongst different developers&#8230; and believe it or not, might very well be more consistent than how some companies are producing their various own web projects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

